4.4 Article

Comparison between lactating and non-lactating dairy cows on follicular growth and corpus luteum development, and endocrine patterns of ovarian steroids and luteinizing hormone in the estrous cycles

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 134, 期 3-4, 页码 112-118

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.08.018

关键词

Dairy cow; Estrous cycle; Lactating; Luteinizing hormone; Ovary; Steroid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamics of ovarian follicle, corpus luteum (CL), and peripheral plasma ovarian steroids were compared between lactating and non-lactating cows, and a possible association of pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion with the dynamics was examined. Lactating (n = 5) and non-lactating (n = 5) cows were monitored daily for follicle and CL throughout two consecutive estrous cycles (Day 0: day of ovulation). Blood samples were collected daily and at 15 min intervals for 8h on Days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 14 of the second cycle. Lactating cows had larger CL (25.4 +/- 1.8 mm vs. 23.5 +/- 1.5 mm, P < 0.01) and greater progesterone concentrations (4.6 +/- 1.0 ng/ml vs. 3.9 +/- 0.9 ng/ml, P<0.01) during mid-luteal phase compared with non-lactating cows. Maximal diameters of the first wave dominant follicle (17.2 +/- 1.8 mm vs. 15.5 +/- 0.8 mm) and the ovulatory follicle (17.9 +/- 1.2 mm vs. 15.2 +/- 0.8 mm) were greater (P < 0.05) in lactating cows than in non-lactating cows during the estrous cycles with two follicular waves, but no significant differences were detected between the groups during the estrous cycles with three follicular waves. Plasma estradiol concentrations did not differ between the groups throughout the experiment. Lactating cows had more LH pulses from Days 2 to 14 than non-lactating cows. These results imply that differences in ovarian dynamics may exist between lactating and non-lactating cows, for which the increased number of LH pulses observed in lactating cows may have responsibility. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据