4.4 Article

Effect of ammonium during in vitro maturation on oocyte nuclear maturation and subsequent embryonic development in pigs

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 117, 期 3-4, 页码 302-307

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.05.012

关键词

Ammonium; Pig; Oocyte maturation; Embryo development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of ammonium in a chemically defined maturation medium on oocyte nuclear maturation and subsequent embryonic development of pigs after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and parthenogenetic activation (PA) were examined. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were matured in Purdue Porcine Medium (PPM) supplemented with 0 mM, 0.02 mM, 0.2 mM, 2 mM, or 20 mM ammonium chloride, or TCM199 with 10% porcine follicle fluid (TCM + pFF: positive control) at 38.7 degrees C in 7% CO2 in air for 40-44 h. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in nuclear maturation was found between oocytes matured in TCM + pFF or PPM with 0 mM, 0.02 mM and 0.2 mM ammonium chloride. However, nuclear maturation was decreased (P < 0.05) in oocytes matured in PPM with 2 mM or 20 mM ammonium. After IVF, oocytes matured in PPM with 20 mM ammonium resulted in embryos with reduced (P < 0.05) embryonic cleavage and blastocyst development than all other treatment groups. After PA, oocytes matured in PPM with 20 mM ammonium resulted in embryos with lesser (P < 0.05) embryonic cleavage compared to TCM + pFF However, PA embryos derived from oocytes matured in PPM with both 2 mM and 20 mM ammonium had reduced (P < 0.05) blastocyst development compared with TCM + pFF. These results demonstrate the detrimental effect of ammonium during in vitro oocyte maturation on nuclear progression to metaphase II. Additionally, the presence of ammonium during in vitro maturation negatively influences subsequent embryonic development, although PA embryos appear to be more sensitive to the negative effects of ammonium during oocyte maturation than do IVF embryos. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据