4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Augmented generalized SENSE reconstruction to correct for rigid body motion

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 90-102

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21106

关键词

MRI; motion; parallel imaging; SENSE; spiral imaging

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41RR09784, P41 RR009784] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB006526, R01 EB011654, R01 EB002711, 1R01EB002711, R01 EB008706] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [1R01NS047607, 5R01NS34866, R01 NS034866, R01 NS047607] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The correction of motion artifacts continues to be a significant problem in MRI. In the case of uncooperative patients, such as children, or patients who are unable to remain stationary, the accurate determination and correction of motion artifacts becomes a very important prerequisite for achieving good image quality. The application of conventional motion-correction strategies often produces inconsistencies in k-space data. As a result, significant residual artifacts can persist. In this work a formalism is introduced for parallel imaging in the presence of motion. The proposed method can improve overall image quality because it diminishes k-space inconsistencies by exploiting the complementary image encoding capacity of individual receiver coils. Specifically, an augmented version of an iterative SENSE reconstruction is used as a means of synthesizing the missing data in k-space. Motion is determined from low-resolution navigator images that are coregistered by an automatic registration routine. Navigator data can be derived from self-navigating k-space trajectories or in combination with other navigation schemes that estimate patient motion. This correction method is demonstrated by interleaved spiral images collected from volunteers. Conventional spiral scans and scans corrected with proposed techniques are shown, and the results illustrate the capacity of this new correction approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据