4.5 Article

Liver gene expression in relation to hepatic steatosis and lipid secretion in two duck species

期刊

ANIMAL GENETICS
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 12-20

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01959.x

关键词

carbohydrate metabolism; duck; gene expression; lipid metabolism; liver

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>The susceptibility to development of hepatic steatosis is known to differ between Muscovy and Pekin ducks. Although some experiments were conducted to decipher these differences, few data have been produced to analyse the role of specific genes in this process. For this purpose, expression levels of genes involved in lipid (ATP citrate lyase, malic enzyme 1, fatty acid synthase, stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1, diacylglycerol O-acyl transferase 2, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, sterol regulatory element binding factor 1, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4, choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1, carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1A, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and sterol O-acyltransferase) and carbohydrate (activating transcription factor 4 or cAMP-response element binding protein, mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase 2 and carbohydrate responsive element binding protein) metabolism and in other functions were analysed in the liver of Pekin and Muscovy ducks fed ad libitum or overfed. A specific positive effect of feeding was observed on the expression of genes involved mainly in fatty acids and TG synthesis and glycolysis, and negative effect on genes involved in beta-oxidation. Interestingly, a strong species effect was also observed on stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 and to a lesser extent on diacylglycerol O-acyl transferase 2 expression, leading to large differences in expression levels between Pekin and Muscovy overfed ducks, which could explain the difference in lipid metabolism and steatosis ability observed between the two duck species. These results should shed light on gene expression that might underlie susceptibility to hepatic steatosis in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据