4.6 Article

Both sulfate-reducing bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae take part in marine biocorrosion of carbon steel

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 161-168

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03053.x

关键词

biocorrosion; biodiversity; carbon steel; cloning-sequencing; cultivation; Enterobacteriaceae; marine biofilm; 16S rRNA genes; SRB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: In order to evaluate the part played in biocorrosion by microbial groups other than sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), we characterized the phylogenetic diversity of a corrosive marine biofilm attached to a harbour pile structure as well as to carbon steel surfaces (coupons) immersed in seawater for increasing time periods (1 and 8 months). We thus experimentally checked corroding abilities of defined species mixtures. Methods and Results: Microbial community analysis was performed using both traditional cultivation techniques and polymerase chain reaction cloning-sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Community structure of biofilms developing with time on immersed coupons tended to reach after 8 months, a steady state similar to the one observed on a harbour pile structure. Phylogenetic affiliations of isolates and cloned 16S rRNA genes (rrs) indicated that native biofilms (developing after 1-month immersion) were mainly colonized by gamma-proteobacteria. Among these, Vibrio species were detected in majority with molecular methods while cultivation techniques revealed dominance of Enterobacteriaceae such as Citrobacter, Klebsiella and Proteus species. Conversely, in mature biofilms (8-month immersion and pile structure), SRB, and to a lesser extent, spirochaetes were dominant. Conclusions: Corroding activity detection assays confirmed that Enterobacteriaceae (members of the gamma-proteobacteria) were involved in biocorrosion of metallic material in marine conditions. Significance and Impact of the Study: In marine biofilms, metal corrosion may be initiated by Enterobacteriaceae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据