4.7 Article

Association of specific haplotypes of neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 2 gene (NTRK2) with vulnerability to nicotine dependence in African-Americans and European-Americans

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 48-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.023

关键词

haplotype; SNP; TrkB; association analysis; nicotine; dependence; tobacco smoking

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR03655] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA-12844] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM28356] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The gene encoding neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 2 (NTRK2) has been localized to a region on chromosome 9q22-q23 that showed a suggestive linkage to nicotine dependence (ND) in our previous linkage analyses. However, no association of NTRK2 with ND has been identified. Methods: Family-based association analyses of 2037 participants (1366 African Americans [AA], 671 European Americans [EA]) representing 602 nuclear families were performed to evaluate association of nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within NTRK2 with ND. Results: Individual SNP-based association analysis indicated that in the EA sample, SNPs rs1659400 and rs1187272 were significantly associated with at least one adjusted ND measure. Haplotype analysis revealed that even after Bonferroni correction, the baplotype T-T-A of rs1659400-rs1187272-rs1122530 bad a highly significant positive association, with adjusted ND measures in the EA sample (max Z = 3.78, p =. 0001, frequency 59.9%). We further identified a major baplotype, T-G-C-A-A (26%), formed by rs993315-rs736744-rs920776-rs4O75274-rs729560, which showed a significant positive association (max Z = 2.97, p=.003) with adjusted ND measures in the AA sample. Conclusions: These results strongly suggest that NTRK2 is a susceptibility gene for ND. These findings imply that NTRK2 plays a role in the etiology of ND and represents an important biological candidate for further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据