4.7 Article

Derivative recovery and a posteriori error estimate for extended finite elements

期刊

COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING
卷 196, 期 35-36, 页码 3381-3399

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.03.011

关键词

extended finite element methods; derivative recovery; a posteriori error estimation; extended moving least squares; fracture mechanics; enrichment; partition of unity; three-dimensional cracks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper is the first attempt at error estimation for extended finite elements. The goal of this work is to devise a simple and effective local a posteriori error estimate for partition of unity enriched finite element methods such as the extended finite element method (XFEM). In each element. the local estimator is the L, norm of the difference between the raw XFEM strain field and an enhanced strain field computed by extended moving least squares (XMLS) derivative recovery obtained from the raw nodal XFEM displacements. The XMLS construction is tailored to the nature of the solution. The technique is applied to linear elastic fracture mechanics, in which near-tip asymptotic functions are added to the MLS basis. The XMLS shape functions are constructed from weight functions following the diffraction criterion to represent the discontinuity. The result is a very smooth enhanced strain solution including the singularity at the crack tip. Results are shown for two- and three-dimensional linear elastic fracture mechanics problems in mode I and mixed mode. The effectivity index of the estimator is close to I and improves upon mesh refinement for the studied near-tip problem. It is also shown that for the linear elastic fracture mechanics problems treated, the proposed estimator outperforms one of the superconvergent patch recovery technique of Zienkiewicz and Zhu. which is only C-0. Parametric studies of the general performance of the estimator are also carried out. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据