4.6 Article

Effects of allicin and diallyl disulfide on in vitro rumen fermentation of a mixed diet

期刊

ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 145, 期 1-4, 页码 351-363

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.050

关键词

diallyl disulfide; allicin; batch cultures; methane; rumen fermentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to determine effects of four doses (i.e. 0, 0.5, 5 and 10 mg/l incubation medium) of allicin and diallyl disulfide on in vitro fermentation of a 1: 1 alfalfa hay:concentrate diet in batch cultures of mixed rumen in micro-organ isms from the rumens of sheep fed either a high forage (HF inoculum; 700:300 alfalfa hay:concentrate; 4 sheep) or a high concentrate (HC inoculum, 300:700 alfalfa hay: concentrate; 4 sheep) diet. It was hypothesised that additive effects would depend on the rumen microbial populations, and thus on the type of diet fed to the host sheep. Initial pH in the incubation medium was 6.98 and 6.39 for HF and HC inoculum, respectively. Since antimicrobial effects of both compounds seemed to be time-dependent, 6, 12 and 24 h incubations, representing 5 replicates on non-consecutive days, were chosen. Allicin at the lowest concentration (i.e. 0.5 mg/l) increased (P<0.05) production of acetate, and the acetate: propionate ratio, at 6 h of incubation, and decreased (P<0.05) hydrogen recovery in batch cultures incoulated with HC rumen fluid. However, these effects did not occurat 12 and 24 h. Diallyl disulfide had similar patterns to allicin, and these were maintained at 12 h of incubation. Only a few interactions (P<0.05) between additives and inoculum type Occurred and, in general. effects of allicin were more pronounced with HC inoculum, and those of diallyl disulfide with the HF inoculum. Results show the potential of these secondary metabolites to modify rumen fermentation, but little is known about the stability of these phytocompounds and how this is related to their effectiveness in the rumen. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据