4.6 Article

Property tuning in charge-transfer chromophores by systematic modulation of the spacer between donor and acceptor

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 19, 页码 5378-5387

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200601735

关键词

conjugation; nonlinear optics; charge transfer; donor-acceptor chromophores; electrochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of donor-acceptor chromophores was prepared in which the spacer separating 4-dimethylanilino (DMA) donor and C(CN)(2) acceptor moieties is systematically varied. All of the new push-pull systems, except 4b, are thermally stable molecules. In series a, the DMA rings are directly attached to the central spacer, whereas in series b additional acetylene moieties are inserted. X-ray crystal structures were obtained for seven of the new, intensely colored target compounds. In series a, the DMA rings are sterically forced out of the mean plane of the residual pi system, whereas the entire conjugated pi system in series b is nearly planar. Support for strong donor-acceptor interactions was obtained through evaluation of the quinoid character of the DMA ring and by NMR and IR spectroscopy. The UV/Vis spectra feature bathochromically shifted, intense charge-transfer bands, with the lowest energy transitions and the smallest optical gap being measured for the two-dimensionally extended chromophores 6a and 6b. The redox behavior of the push-pull molecules was investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). In the series 1b, 2b, 4b, 5b, in which the spacer between donor and acceptor moieties is systematically enlarged, the electro-chemical gap decreases steadily from 1.94V (1b) to 1.53V (5b). This decrease is shown to be a consequence of a reduction in the D-A conjugation with increasing spacer length. Degenerate four-wave mixing experiments reveal high third-order optical nonlinearities, pointing to potentially interesting applications of some of the new chromophores in optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据