4.4 Article

The North American bullfrog as a reservoir for the spread of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Brazil

期刊

ANIMAL CONSERVATION
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 53-61

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00307.x

关键词

North American bullfrog; trade; chytridiomycosis; Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis; Brazil; gene sequencing

资金

  1. New York Community Trust
  2. Eppley Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB-02133851]
  4. V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global trade in the North American bullfrog Rana catesbeiana has been implicated in the introduction and spread of the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Large-scale production of the North American bullfrog for human consumption has been ongoing since the early part of the 20th century, particularly in Brazil, a pioneer in bullfrog farming following its introduction in the 1930s. In order to determine whether bullfrogs introduced to Brazil and farmed for the food trade serve as reservoirs for amphibian disease, we tested individuals located in the Brazilian states of Sao Paulo and Para to determine the prevalence of B. dendrobatidis infections. We were able to confirm B. dendrobatidis on five farms (78.5% infection prevalence overall) by PCR. Isolates were obtained from three of the five farms and genotyped at 17 loci using multilocus sequence typing. Five isolates from the Brazilian farms were genotypically similar to each other as well as to isolates from Central and South America. Isolates from farmed bullfrogs were more similar to isolates from introduced populations in Venezuela than those from the native range of the bullfrog in eastern North America. These results could have important implications for the origin and spread of B. dendrobatidis in Brazil, its neighboring regions and the conservation of native amphibian fauna. They may also suggest a potential for prior recombination within B. dendrobatidis in bullfrogs, which may have implications for the recent emergence of this pathogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据