3.8 Article

Dissection of Signal Transduction Pathways as a Tool for the Development of Targeted Therapies of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

期刊

REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 217-236

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/157488707781662715

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; genomic instability; signal transduction pathways; apoptosis; cell cycle; gene therapy

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana Ricerche sul Cancro
  2. Ministero dell'Istruzione, Universita e Ricerca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic instability during hepatocarcinogenesis causes changes in signal transduction network. Strategies for identification of new markers/therapeutic targets include discovery of early molecular changes during hepatocarcinogenesis, relevant to preneoplastic lesions progression to full malignancy in rodent models, and evaluation of these changes in human hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Activation of ERB receptor family, MAPK, JAK-STAT, beta-Catenin cascades, c-Myc targets, iNOS-IKK/MAT1A-NF-kB axis, Ornithine decarboxylase, Cyclins and CDKs occurs in human and rodent hepatocarcinogenesis. This is associated with downregulation of the cell cycle inhibitors p16(INK4A) and p53 and TGF-beta/SMAD signaling. Oncosuppressor genes, including p16 INK4A, E-CAD, and DLC-1 are often hypermethylated in humans and rodents. Moreover, protection of cell cycle from p16(INK4A) inhibition by upregulation of CDC37, HSP90, and CRM1 correlates to HCC progression. A body of evidence indicates that inhibition of key genes of aforementioned signaling pathways by antisense or siRNA approaches or specific inhibitors restraints growth of in vitro cultured or in vivo xenografted HCCs. Efforts are currently dedicated to improve transduction efficiency. HCC cells may escape gene therapy by various mechanisms. Attempts to overcome this difficulty include discovery of new therapeutic targets, gene therapy directed to different molecular targets essential for tumor cell survival and specifically directed to HCC subtypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据