4.4 Article

Molecular paternity determination in captive bonobos and the impact of inbreeding on infant mortality

期刊

ANIMAL CONSERVATION
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 306-312

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00186.x

关键词

Pan paniscus; microsatellite DNA; inbreeding depression; infant mortality; captive-breeding programme; hair samples

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inbreeding and the loss of genetic diversity may lower fitness and reduce the potential for a population to adapt to changing environments. In small populations, for example in captive populations or populations of endangered species, this can have considerable consequences for their survival. We investigated the effects of inbreeding on infant mortality in the world captive population of bonobos Pan paniscus. Using a combination of studbook data and high-quality pedigree data from genotyped individuals, inbreeding information was available for 142 captive-born individuals. For the determination of paternities that were unresolved in the studbook, nuclear microsatellite DNA was amplified from hair and blood samples using the Great Ape Kit and PowerPlex((R)) 16 System. In total, 54 bonobos (17 offspring and their putative parents) were genotyped at eight tetranucleotide repeat microsatellite loci. Inbreeding coefficients were calculated for each individual for whom paternity was confirmed by either studbook data or DNA analysis. We found significantly higher infant mortality in inbred offspring compared with non-inbred offspring, suggesting that inbreeding reduces infant survival in captive bonobos. In addition, we argue that the total magnitude of inbreeding depression is probably underestimated in this captive population. In conclusion, even though the breeding programme of captive bonobos is aimed at avoiding inbreeding, closely related individuals do occasionally produce offspring that do show inbreeding depression. There is, however, no indication that this currently threatens the long-time survival of the captive population of bonobos.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据