4.3 Article

Interoperability of neuroscience modeling software: Current status and future directions

期刊

NEUROINFORMATICS
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 127-138

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-007-0004-5

关键词

neural simulation software; simulation language; standards; XML; model publication

资金

  1. MRC [G90/100] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G90/100] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G90/100] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA016454, DA16454] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDCD NIH HHS [P01 DC004732, DC04732] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NINDS NIH HHS [NS11613, R01 NS011613-32, R01 NS011613] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroscience increasingly uses computational models to assist in the exploration and interpretation of complex phenomena. As a result, considerable effort is invested in the development of software tools and technologies for numerical simulations and for the creation and publication of models. The diversity of related tools leads to the duplication of effort and hinders model reuse. Development practices and technologies that support interoperability between software systems therefore play an important role in making the modeling process more efficient and in ensuring that published models can be reliably and easily reused. Various forms of interoperability are possible including the development of portable model description standards, the adoption of common simulation languages or the use of standardized middleware. Each of these approaches finds applications within the broad range of current modeling activity. However more effort is required in many areas to enable new scientific questions to be addressed. Here we present the conclusions of the Neuro-IT Interoperability of Simulators workshop, held at the 11th computational neuroscience meeting in Edinburgh (July 19-20 2006; http://www.cnsorg.org). We assess the current state of interoperability of neural simulation software and explore the future directions that will enable the field to advance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据