4.2 Review

Pharmacodynamic of cyclooxygenase inhibitors in humans

期刊

PROSTAGLANDINS & OTHER LIPID MEDIATORS
卷 82, 期 1-4, 页码 85-94

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2006.05.019

关键词

cyclooxygenase-1; cyclooxygenase-2; tNSAIDs; coxibs; prostacyclin; thromboxane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We provide comprehensive knowledge on the differential regulation of expression and catalysis of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 in health and disease which represents an essential requirement to read out the clinical consequences of selective and nonselective inhibition of COX-isozymes in humans. Furthermore, we describe the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of major traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs) and coxibs (selective COX-2 inhibitors) which play a prime role in their efficacy and toxicity. Important information derived from our pharmacological studies has clarified that nonselective COX inhibitors should be considered the tNSAIDs with a balanced inhibitory effect on both COX-isozymes (exemplified by ibuprofen and naproxen). In contrast, the tNSAIDs meloxicam, nimesulide and diclofenac (which are from 18- to 29-fold more potent towards COX-2 in vitro) and coxibs (i.e. celecoxib, valdecoxib, rofecoxib, etoricoxib and lumiracoxib, which are from 30- to 433-fold more potent towards COX-2 in vitro) should be comprised into the cluster of COX-2 inhibitors. However, the dose and frequency of administration together with individual responses will drive the degree of COX-2 inhibition and selectivity achieved in vivo. The results of clinical pharmacology of COX inhibitors support the concept that the inhibition of platelet COX-1 may translate into an increased incidence of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding but this effect on platelet COX-1 may mitigate the cardiovascular hazard associated with the profound inhibition of COX-2-dependent prostacyclin (PGI(2)). (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据