4.5 Article

How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology

期刊

ANIMAL COGNITION
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 223-238

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0448-8

关键词

Phylogenetic comparative methods; Evolution; Adaptation; Phylogeny; Function; Cognitive evolution; Selective pressure

资金

  1. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent)
  2. National Science Foundation [EF-0905606, NSF-BCS-08-27552-02, NSF-BCS-10-25172, NSF- BCS-0923791, BCS-0923791]
  3. European Research Commission [233297]
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1025172] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Now more than ever animal studies have the potential to test hypotheses regarding how cognition evolves. Comparative psychologists have developed new techniques to probe the cognitive mechanisms underlying animal behavior, and they have become increasingly skillful at adapting methodologies to test multiple species. Meanwhile, evolutionary biologists have generated quantitative approaches to investigate the phylogenetic distribution and function of phenotypic traits, including cognition. In particular, phylogenetic methods can quantitatively (1) test whether specific cognitive abilities are correlated with life history (e.g., lifespan), morphology (e.g., brain size), or socio-ecological variables (e.g., social system), (2) measure how strongly phylogenetic relatedness predicts the distribution of cognitive skills across species, and (3) estimate the ancestral state of a given cognitive trait using measures of cognitive performance from extant species. Phylogenetic methods can also be used to guide the selection of species comparisons that offer the strongest tests of a priori predictions of cognitive evolutionary hypotheses (i.e., phylogenetic targeting). Here, we explain how an integration of comparative psychology and evolutionary biology will answer a host of questions regarding the phylogenetic distribution and history of cognitive traits, as well as the evolutionary processes that drove their evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据