4.5 Article

Stacking of irregularly shaped blocks in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and young humans (Homo sapiens)

期刊

ANIMAL COGNITION
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 S49-S58

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0273-5

关键词

Chimpanzees; Stacking blocks; Physical understanding

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and Japan Society for Promotion of Science [19700245, 16203034, 16002001, 20002001]
  2. Benesse Corporation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20002001, 16002001, 19700245, 16203034] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stacking blocks provides a way to evaluate cognitive development in humans and other species using the same comparative measures. The present study used regular cubic blocks as well as cubic blocks with bumps on two sides. The bumps changed the physical properties of the blocks and increased the difficulty involved in stacking them. Subjects were required to choose the appropriate orientation for stacking the blocks. Three juvenile chimpanzees and 14 human children ( aged 2-3 years) were tested under identical task settings in a face-to-face situation. The goal of a trial was to stack up four blocks ( two cubic blocks and two cubic blocks with bumps). The results showed initial difficulty in stacking the blocks with bumps in both chimpanzees and humans. Experienced juvenile chimpanzees and humans older than 3 years became proficient at solving the task. Behavioral strategies adopted to succeed in the task were common to both species. The subjects spontaneously adopted a strategy of stacking as the last block of the tower a block with a bump facing upwards. The subjects also showed active change in the orientation of the blocks when necessary, although correct orientation changes were infrequent especially during the early phases of experiment. The results are discussed in the context of the underlying cognitive development in the domain of physical understanding in both species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据