4.3 Article

Sodium fusidate-poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres:: Preparation, characterisation and in vivo evaluation of their effectiveness in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROENCAPSULATION
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 577-595

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02652040701472584

关键词

sodium fusidate; poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres; emulsion solvent evaporation method; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; chronic osteomyelitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The aim of this study was to prepare poly(D, L- lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microspheres containing sodium fusidate ( SF) using a double emulsion solvent evaporation method with varying polymer: drug ratios (1: 1, 2.5: 1, 5: 1) and to evaluate its efficiency for the local treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. Methods: The particle size and distribution, morphological characteristics, thermal behaviour, drug content, encapsulation efficiency and in vitro release assessments of the formulations had been carried out. Sterilized SF-PLGA microspheres were implanted in the proximal tibia of rats with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) osteomyelitis. After 3 weeks of treatment, bone samples were analysed with a microbiological assay. Results: PLGA microspheres between the size ranges of 2.16-4.12 mu m were obtained. Production yield of all formulations was found to be higher than 79% and encapsulation efficiencies of 19.8-34.3% were obtained. DSC thermogram showed that the SF was in an amorphous state in the microspheres and the glass transition temperature ( Tg) of PLGA was not influenced by the preparation procedure. In vitro drug release studies had indicated that these microspheres had significant burst release and their drug release rates were decreased upon increasing the polymer: drug ratio (p < 0.05). Based on the in vivo data, rats implanted with SF-PLGA microspheres and empty microspheres showed 1987 +/- 1196 and 55526 +/- 49086 colony forming unit of MRSA in 1 g bone samples (CFU/g), respectively (p < 0.01).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据