4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Microstructure, tensile and fatigue properties of AA6061/20 vao.%Al2O3p friction stir welded joints

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.009

关键词

metal matrix composites (MMCs); mechanical testing; electron microscopy; joints

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal matrix composites reinforced with Al2O3 particles combine the matrix properties with those of the ceramic reinforcement, leading to higher stiffness and superior thermal stability with respect to the corresponding unreinforced alloys. However, their wide application as structural materials needs proper development of a suitable joining processes. The present work describes the results obtained from microstructural (optical and scanning electron microscopy) and mechanical evaluation (hardness, tensile and low-cycle fatigue tests) of an aluminium alloy (AA6061) matrix composite reinforced with 20 vol.% fraction of Al2O3 particles (W6A20A), welded using the friction stir welding process. The mechanical response of the FSW composite was compared with that of the base material and the results were discussed in the light of microstructural modifications induced by the FSW process on the aluminium alloy matrix and on the ceramic reinforcement. The FSW reduced the size of both particles reinforcement and aluminium grains and also led to overaging of the matrix alloys due to the frictional heating during welding. The FSW specimens, tested without any post-weld heat treatment or surface modification showed lower tensile strength and higher elongation to failure respect to the base material. The low-cycle fatigue life of the FSW composite was always lower than that of the base material, mainly at the lower strain-amplitude value. The cyclic stress response curves of the FSW composite showed evidence of progressive hardening to failure, at all cyclic strain-amplitudes, while the base material showed a progressive softening. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据