4.5 Article

Nurse bee behaviour manipulates worker honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) reproductive development

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 253-261

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.012

关键词

Apis mellifera; body mass; division of labour; food delivery; honeybee; larval development program; nonreproductive caste; nurse feeding program; ovariole number; reproductive development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolution of nonreproductive castes is a fundamental question in evolution biology. The honeybee Apis mellifera L. has a reproductive division of labour: the queen is the primary egg-layer in a colony and has more than 200 ovarian filaments (ovarioles), whereas a worker normally does not reproduce and has fewer than 20 ovarioles. The number of ovarioles influences worker foraging behaviour and the propensity to become an egg-layer in the absence of the queen, suggesting that reproductive regulatory networks evolved with foraging division of labour in honeybee workers. Cooperation between nurse bee feeding behaviour and larval developmental programming results in the differentiation of queens and workers along with variation in ovariole number, body mass and foraging behaviour. Here, we tested how nurse bees affect ovariole number and body mass in workers, and how larvae respond to food delivery during different larval life stages. Our findings demonstrate that nurses control larvae growth and ovariole number by temporally manipulating food delivery and that the response of larvae to food differs with larval life stage and genotype. Body mass of larvae was more sensitive to nutrition during the first to the fourth instar (L1-L4), whereas ovariole number was more sensitive during the fifth instar (L5). Overall, we were able to decouple the nurse feeding program and the larval development program in honeybees. We conclude that nurse feeding behaviour during L5 is critical for modulating ovariole number in workers. (C) 2014 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据