4.5 Article

The more the merrier? Condition-dependent brood mixing in earwigs

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 86, 期 4, 页码 845-850

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.07.027

关键词

alloparental care; brood mixing; brood parasitism; cannibalism; competition; condition; Forficula auricularia; group living; kin discrimination; parental care

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00A-119190]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parental care is beneficial for offspring, but costly for parents. Thus, it seems maladaptive to care for unrelated offspring unless the additional offspring provide direct benefits to the carer's own offspring or discrimination costs are high. Females of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia, provide maternal care for their own offspring ( nymphs), but also for foreign nymphs that join their brood. Nymphs preferentially kill and cannibalize nonsiblings and individuals that are smaller or in poor condition. Here, we tested the effects of nymph condition and food availability on brood mixing in F. auricularia. We experimentally manipulated nymph condition by feeding or food depriving groups of unrelated nymphs. The resident groups remained with their mothers whereas the mothers were removed from the foreign groups. Since nymph condition determines the direction of cannibalism, we hypothesized that brood mixing is dependent on nymph condition and food availability in the environment. Our results show that brood mixing was initially driven by condition-dependent effects on nymph activity, and later by the fed foreigners invading resident broods, suggesting that foreigners control brood mixing, independent of food availability. These results are consistent with our hypothesis that the dynamics of brood mixing are condition dependent, possibly mediated by corresponding cannibalism threats. (C) 2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据