4.5 Article

Shift of song frequencies in response to masking tones

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 435-440

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.003

关键词

black-capped chickadee; communication; frequency; interference; masking; noise; overlap; plasticity; Poecile atricapillus; song

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1028964]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1028964] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ambient noise can interfere with signal transmission and detection across many taxa and modalities. Evidence suggests that, over time, signals evolve to minimize interference from ambient noise and other signalling animals. Less well studied is the possibility of short-term behavioural responses to transient ambient noise, in which animals actively adjust signal parameters to recover signalling efficacy. Here we test animals' capacity to adjust vocal signal parameters in the face of transient acoustic interference. In field trials we monitored the songs of territorial male black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus, determined the frequencies of their 'fee-bee' songs, and broadcast tones to closely mask subjects' 'bee' notes. We also presented control nonmasking tones of 5 kHz, well above birds' song frequencies. Our main finding was that males responded to masking tones by shifting song frequencies after an average of 66.4 s from tone onset, whereas frequency shifts in the presence of nonmasking tones occurred only after an average of 95.8 s. The quicker shift in frequencies in the face of masking noise provides new evidence for vocal behavioural plasticity, and further reveals how behavioural plasticity together with evolutionary adaptations can minimize the detrimental effects of ambient noise on communication. (C) 2012 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据