4.4 Article

Oscillatory dynamics arising from competitive inhibition and multisite phosphorylation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 244, 期 1, 页码 68-76

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.013

关键词

systems biology; modelling; MAPK; phosphorylation; signalling networks; bistability; oscillations

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM59570, R01 GM059570-07] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH045573] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There have been a growing number of observations of oscillating protein levels (p53 and NFkB) in eukaryotic signalling pathways. This has resulted in a renewed interest in the mechanism by which such oscillations might occur. Recent computational work has shown that a multisite phosphorylation mechanism such as that found in the MAPK cascade can theoretically exhibit bistability. The bistable behavior was shown to arise from sequestration and saturation mechanisms for the enzymes that catalyse the multisite phosphorylation cycle. These effects generate the positive feedback necessary for bistability. In this paper we describe two kinds of oscillatory dynamics which can occur in a network by which.. both use such bistable multisite phosphorylated cycles. In the first example, the fully phosphorylated form of the phosphorylated cycle represses the production of the kinase, which carries out the phosphorylation of the unphosphorylated states of the cycle. The dynamics of this system leads to a relaxation oscillator. In the second example, we consider a cascade of two cycles, in which the fully phosphorylated form of the kinase, in the first cycle.. phosphorylates the unphosphorylated forms in the second cycle. A feedback loop, by which the fully phosphorylated form of the second cycle inhibits the kinase step in the first cycle is also present. In this case we obtain a ring oscillator. Both these networks illustrate the versatility of the multisite bistable network. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据