4.6 Article

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) β is acetylated at multiple lysines -: Acetylation of C/EBP β at lysine 39 modulates its ability to activate transcription

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 282, 期 2, 页码 956-967

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M511451200

关键词

-

资金

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R03 TW008143] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [T32-HD07505] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK074377-01, 5P60 DK20572, DK46072] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32-GM07315] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcription factor function can be modulated by post-translational modifications. Because the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) beta associates with the nuclear coactivator p300, which contains acetyltransferase activity, acetylation of C/EBP beta was examined to understand its regulation and function. C/EBP beta is acetylated by acetyltransferases p300 and p300/CREB-binding protein associated factor. Endogenous C/EBP beta in 3T3-F442A preadipocytes is also recognized by an acetyl-lysine-specific antibody. Analysis of truncations of C/EBP beta and peptides based on C/EBP beta sequences identified multiple lysines within C/EBP beta that can be acetylated. Among these, a novel acetylation site at lysine 39 of C/EBP beta was identified. Mutation of Lys-39 to arginine or alanine impairs its acetylation and the ability of C/EBP beta to activate transcription at the promoters for C/EBP beta and c-fos. Different C/EBP beta-responsive promoters require different patterns of acetylated lysines in C/EBP beta for transcription activation. Furthermore, C/EBP beta acetylation was increased by growth hormone, and mutation of Lys-39 impaired growth hormone-stimulated c-fos promoter activation. These data suggest that acetylation of Lys-39 of C/EBP beta, alone or in combination with acetylation at other lysines, may play a role in C/EBP beta-mediated transcriptional activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据