4.5 Review

Dominance and plumage traits: meta-analysis and metaregression analysis

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 3-19

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.022

关键词

badge of status; bird; carotenoid; melanin; model presentation; publication bias; sexual selection; structural colour; trim and fill

资金

  1. University of Otago
  2. Marsden grant [UOO-0812]
  3. Agrocampus Ouest
  4. EXPLO'RA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of avian signalling systems is an important avenue for research on animal communication. More specifically, the use of plumage traits to signal status or fighting ability has been extensively investigated for over 30 years. Yet, little is known about how strong and general the relationship between dominance and plumage traits is across different bird species. We conducted meta-analysis and metaregression analysis to investigate the relationship between dominance and plumage characteristics, using published literature on avian species. Our analyses tested possible moderators of this relationship, such as plumage trait and plumage colour, plumage manipulation, study location, type of dominance interaction, the use of model birds, type of dominance assessment and dominance context (breeding or nonbreeding). Our results revealed a significant effect size for the association between dominance and plumage. We found that the relationship between dominance and plumage was significantly influenced by the dominance assessment method used in the source study (direct or indirect). Furthermore, our analyses provide evidence that the role of plumage signalling may be similarly important during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. We conclude that plumage signalling is a ubiquitous form of communicating status or fighting ability across bird species with different plumage types. (C) 2011 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据