4.6 Article

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression is required on multiple cell types for the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 178, 期 2, 页码 851-857

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.2.851

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 017009] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 46032] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many members of the Ig superfamily of adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Although it is well-established that VCAM-1/VLA-4 interactions can play important roles in mediating CNS inflammatory events in multiple sclerosis patients and during the development of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), the contributions of ICAM-1 are poorly understood. This is due in large part to conflicting results from Ab inhibition studies and the observation of exacerbated EAE in ICAM-1 mutant mice that express a restricted set of ICAM-1 isoforms. To determine ICAM-1-mediated mechanisms in EAE, we analyzed ICAM-1 null mutant mice (ICAM-1(null)), which express no ICAM-1 isoforms. ICAM-1(null) mice had significantly attenuated EAE characterized by markedly reduced spinal cord T cell infiltration and IFN-gamma production by these cells. Adoptive transfer of Ag-restimulated T cells from wild-type to ICAM-1(nul)l mice or transfer of ICAM-1(null) Ag-restimulated T cells to control mice failed to induce EAE. ICAM-1(null) T cells also showed reduced proliferative capacity and substantially reduced levels of IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-12 compared with that of control T cells following myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein 35-55 restimulation in vitro. Our results indicate that ICAM-1 expression is critical on T cells and other cell types for the development of demyelinating disease and suggest that expression of VCAM-1 and other adhesion molecules cannot fully compensate for the loss of ICAM-1 during EAE development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据