4.3 Article

Immunoblot analysis of IgG antibody response to Sarcoptes scabiei in swine

期刊

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 115, 期 1-2, 页码 179-183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.10.006

关键词

swine; Sarcoptes scabiei; immunoblotting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was performed to determine the frequencies and specificities of IgG antibodies binding to component of Sarcoptes scabiei extracts in swine with hypersensitive and chronic mange. The hypersensitive form is characterised by pruritus and the presence of small red papules over the flanks and belly. The chronic form is characterised by crusts, which contain large numbers of mites and are attached to the skin; the lesions are most commonly found on the internal pinna extending into the auditory canal. S. scabiei mite extract was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with subsequent immunoblotting. IgG-binding proteins were detected with individual sera from 30 hypersensitive and 21 chronically infected pigs; eight Specific Pathogen Free pigs were used as negative controls. Seven protein bands with molecular weights ranging from > 220 to 30 Kilodalton (KDD) (> 220, 218, 110, 80, 66, 52, 36 KDD) strongly bound with IgG antibodies; five out of these seven components (218, 110, 80, 66, 52 KDD) bound also with sera from negative pigs. There is a statistically significant difference in the antigenic recognition spectra between hypersensitive and chronically infected pigs; component of > 220 KDD is more frequently 2 recognized by chronically infected pigs (P = 0.0006, chi(2) = 11.74), in contrast component of 36 KDD is more frequently recognized 2 by hypersensitive pigs (P = 0.001, chi(2) = 10). Our results clearly indicate there is a difference in the reactivity to antigenic peptides/proteins of S. scabiei mite between hypersensitive and chronically infected pigs, and revealed that only two antigens may be considered S. scabiei-specific and used for diagnostic purposes in swine. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据