4.8 Article

Phage as a molecular recognition element in biosensors immobilized by physical adsorption

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 986-992

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.03.025

关键词

beta-galactosidase; phage display; binding; solid-liquid interface; acoustic wave

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [1 R21 AI055645] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biosensors based on landscape phages immobilized by physical adsorption on the surface of a quartz crystal microbalance was used for detection of beta-galactosidase from Escherichia coli. The sensor had a detection limit of a few nanomoles and a response time of a similar to 100 s over the range of 0.003-210 nM. The binding dose-response curve had a typical sigmoid shape and the signal was saturated at the beta-galactosidase concentration of about 200 nM. A marked selectivity for beta-galactosidase over BSA was observed in mixed solutions even when the concentration of BSA exceeded the concentration of beta-galactosidase by a factor of similar to 2000. The apparent value of the dissociation constant (K-d) of the interaction of free phage with beta-galactosidase (9.1 +/- 0.9 mu M) was smaller compared with the one calculated for the bound phage (1.7 +/- 0.5 nM). The binding was specific with three binding sites needed to bind a single molecule of beta-galactosidase. The Kd obtained from the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the phage and the monoclonal anti-beta-galactosidase antibodies were 21 +/- 2 and 26 +/- 2 nM, respectively. Although the method of physical adsorption is simpler and more economical in comparison with Langmuir-Blodgett and molecular assembling methods the performances of the sensors made by these technologies compare well. This work provides evidence that phage can be used as a recognition element in biosensors using physical adsorption method for immobilization of phage on the sensor surface. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据