4.7 Article

CD8+T-cell content in diagnostic lymph nodes measured by flow cytometry is a predictor of survival in follicular lymphoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 388-397

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1734

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Follicular lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease with variable prognosis and clinical course. We hypothesized that the presence of nonmalignant T cells in the microenvironment of the tumor may affect the outcome. Experimental Design: Using flow cytometry, we evaluated the T-cell subsets in the lymph node microenvironment of follicular lymphoma. All patients in South Stockholm County with indolent follicular lymphoma and with flow cytometry done on a diagnostic lymph node between 1994 and 2004 were included (N = 139). Diagnosis and grade (1, 2, and 3a) were confirmed by re-review. Flow cytometry results were reanalyzed. Lymphocyte subsets, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, grade, and clinical characteristics were evaluated in univariable and multivariable Cox analysis with respect to overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results: Higher CD8(+) T-cell levels correlated with longer CIS and DSS, independently of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (OS, P = 0.017; DSS, P = 0.020) and independently of all other prognostic factors (OS, P = 0.001; DSS, P = 0.004). Median OS was not reached for patients in the upper quarter of CD8(+) T-cell levels (>8.6%),10.4 years for patients in the middle half (4.2-8.6%), and 6.0 years for patients in the lower quarter (<4.2%). Furthermore, patients who had not required treatment within 6 months from diagnosis had more CD8(+) T cells (P = 0.011). Conclusions: Higher levels of CD8(+) T cells predict a better prognosis, and these data support an important role for nonmalignant immune cells in the biology of follicular lymphoma. Evaluating the CD8(+) T cells by flow cytometry at diagnosis may provide prognostic information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据