4.8 Article

Supplemental activation method for high-efficiency electron-transfer dissociation of doubly protonated peptide precursors

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 477-485

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac061457f

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [5T32HG002706] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [5T32GM08349, R01 GM080148-02, R01 GM080148, R01 GM080148-01A1, T32 GM008349] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron-transfer dissociation (ETD) delivers the unique attributes of electron capture dissociation to mass spectrometers that utilize radio frequency trapping-type devices (e.g., quadrupole ion traps). The method has generated significant interest because of its compatibility with chromatography and its ability to: (1) preserve traditionally labile post-translational modifications (PTMs) and (2) randomly cleave the backbone bonds of highly charged peptide and protein precursor ions. ETD, however, has shown limited applicability to doubly protonated peptide precursors, [M + 2H](2+), the charge and type of peptide most frequently encountered in bottom-up proteomics. Here we describe a supplemental collisional activation (CAD) method that targets the nondissociated (intact) electron-transfer (ET) product species ([M + 2H](+center dot)) to improve ETD efficiency for doubly protonated peptides (ETcaD). A systematic study of supplementary activation conditions revealed that low-energy CAD of the ET product population leads to the near-exclusive generation of c- and z-type fragment ions with relatively high efficiency (77 +/- 8%). Compared to those formed directly via ETD, the fragment ions were found to comprise increased relative amounts of the odd-electron c-type ions (c(+center dot)) and the even-electron z-type ions (z(+)). A large-scale analysis of 755 doubly charged tryptic peptides was conducted to compare the method (ETcaD) to ion trap CAD and ETD. ETcaD produced a median sequence coverage of 89%-a significant improvement over ETD (63%) and ion trap CAD (77%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据