4.7 Article

Assessment of soil structural differentiation around earthworm burrows by means of X-ray computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 137, 期 3-4, 页码 378-387

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.08.030

关键词

earthworm burrows; drilosphere; soil bulk density distribution; soil microstructure; soil compaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The burrowing activity of earthworms creates a distinct area around the resulting macropores called the drilosphere, which controls various soil processes. Density and microstructure of the drilosphere were studied and compared with those of the surrounding soil. For this purpose soil cores were separately inoculated with the vertically burrowing earthworm species Lumbricus terrestris. After 70 days some cores were compacted by a hydraulic press (250 kPa) and all cores were analysed by means of X-ray computed tomography. Mean Hounsfield Units were measured for concentric ROI cylinders (ROI=region of interest) of increasing diameters located around vertical macropore sections within selected horizontal slices. Based on these data we estimated stepwise the distribution of bulk density from the inner boundary of the drilospbere to the surrounding soil. In uncompacted soil the bulk density of the drilosphere was increased by 11% over that of the surrounding soil. In cross section, drilosphere and burrow form a concentric area with a total radius up to 2.2 cm. Soil compaction increased the dry bulk density of soil and decreased the diameter of earthworm burrows. Moreover, we found a less dense part of soil between the dense drilosphere and the remaining soil of the compacted core. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the coarse silt particles of the bulk soil were rearranged to a parallel orientation due to compaction whereas the microstructure of the drilosphere remained unchanged. In any case, the drilosphere revealed a very homogeneous and dense arrangement of silt particles. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据