4.5 Article

Plumage coloration, ejaculate quality and reproductive phenotype in the red-backed fairy-wren

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 79, 期 6, 页码 1239-1246

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.020

关键词

phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis; sexual competence; sexual selection; sperm competition; sperm quality

资金

  1. University of Chicago
  2. National Science Foundation [IOB-051697, IBN 0213075, IBN 9972607]
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0964826] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how pre- and postcopulatory sexually selected traits covary can provide insight into the evolution of male ornamentation and female mate choice. In this study, we examined ejaculate quality and investment in testicular tissue in relation to plumage colour and social status in the genetically promiscuous red-backed fairy-wren, Malurus melanocephalus. In this species, males exhibit one of three alternative reproductive phenotypes during the breeding season: males can breed in red and black plumage, breed in brown plumage, or act as brown-plumed, nonbreeding auxiliaries. We found that red/black breeders invested more heavily in spermatogenic tissue, had larger sperm reserves, and tended to have greater numbers of sperm in ejaculate samples, when compared to brown breeders and auxiliaries. Within red/black breeders, plumage redness and saturation (i.e. long wavelength hue and increased red chroma) were negatively correlated with ejaculate sample sperm density. In addition, ejaculate motility appeared to be related to variation in plumage coloration such that, overall, males with less elaborate ornamentation showed greater ejaculate quality. These results suggest that pre- and postcopulatory traits negatively covary in red/black plumed red-backed fairy-wrens and indicate a possible trade-off between investment in plumage ornaments and investment in ejaculates. (C) 2010 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据