4.5 Article

Inducing traditions in captive capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 80, 期 6, 页码 955-964

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.08.023

关键词

capuchin; Cebus; conformity; foraging; habit formation; skill acquisition; socially mediated learning; tradition

资金

  1. L.S.B. Leakey Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potential foraging and social traditions have been identified in groups of wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus spp.). Verification of traditions requires documentation that socially mediated learning contributes to acquisition by new practitioners. We investigated the emergence and maintenance of a foraging tradition in two generations of infant tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) in captive social groups. In baseline, we provided the first cohort of infants with a foraging apparatus that dispensed juice via two methods inside a small enclosure away from adult interference (the creche). Later in phase 1, we provided a second apparatus to all group members with only one method of solution available (in the group setting); the creche apparatus, with both methods available, remained accessible to infants only. Two years later (phase 2), we replicated phase 1 with a new cohort of infants from the same social groups. As adult activity and expertise with the apparatus increased across baseline (no adult activity), phase 1 (initially unskilled) and phase 2 (initially skilled), the proportion of infants in each cohort that acquired the foraging skill increased and their latency to skill acquisition decreased. Despite ambiguous evidence that the infants conformed to the specific method of solution common in their group, the social context clearly contributed to the development and maintenance of a general foraging tradition. The results provide support for the existence of traditions in wild capuchin groups. (C) 2010 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据