4.5 Article

Dynamics of learning in the context of courtship in Drosophila persimilis and D-pseudoobscura

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 253-259

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.010

关键词

assortative mating; Drosophila persimilis; Drosophila pseudoobscura; fruit fly; learning; speciation

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada,
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation and Ontario Innovation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent data indicating that male fruit flies adaptively reduce courtship of heterospecific females, which typically reject them, suggest that learning could contribute to reduced levels of matings between individuals from diverging populations with partial premating isolation. To further examine the robustness of learning in the context of courtship in fruit flies, I wished to broaden the types of experience provided to males prior to testing. In both Drosophila persimilis and D. pseudoobscura, alternating trials of mating with conspecific females and rejection by heterospecific females produced the strongest reduction in heterospecific courtship. Trials of rejection by heterospecific females produced equally strong reduction in heterospecific courtship in D. persimilis but not in D. pseudoobscura, whereas trials of mating with conspecific females did not reduce heterospecific courtship at all. The pattern of strong reduction in heterospecific courtship was also replicated when I simulated the likely natural scenario in which males interact with conspecific females since eclosion and later encounter and experience rejection by heterospecific females. The results indicate that a variety of relevant experiences cause a rapid decrease in the time that male fruit flies spend courting heterospecific females. Such learning in partially reproductively isolated populations could contribute to speciation. (c) 2008 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据