4.5 Article

Female preference for male phenotypic traits in a fiddler crab: do females use absolute or comparative evaluation?

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 139-143

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.09.019

关键词

comparative evaluation; female preference; fiddler crab; male traits; mate choice; Uca mjoebergi

资金

  1. School of Botany and Zoology
  2. Australian National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While mate choice is often assumed to be based on an absolute value that may reflect underlying male quality, many mating systems facilitate the comparative evaluation of males. Females can encounter a number of potential mates, either sequentially or simultaneously, before making a mate choice decision. Consequently, the attractiveness of one male may depend on the attractiveness of other males a female has previously encountered. To examine whether female choice in the fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi is based on the comparative evaluation of males, I altered the social context in which a set of males were encountered. Using a robotic crab system to manipulate claw size and wave rate directly, I determined female preference for two male options in the absence and presence of an asymmetrically dominating decoy option. The decoy male option was designed to change the relative attractiveness of the initial two male options. The presence of the decoy significantly altered the absolute preference, but not the relative preference, for the two male options. While this study clearly demonstrates that female U. mjoebergi are not using strict absolute preferences when ranking each male's attractiveness, it does not conclusively support comparative evaluation mechanisms. One possibility is that sexually selected traits in a complex signalling system often vary in how reliably they reflect male quality, and females may use a combination of absolute and comparative measures when assessing male quality. (C) 2008 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据