4.4 Article

3′-azido-3′-deoxythymidine-(5′)-tetraphospho-(5′)-adenosine, the product of ATP-Mediated excision of chain-terminating AZTMP, is a potent chain-terminating substrate for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 828-836

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi061364s

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI60452, AI52010] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The resistance of HIV-1 to 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (AZT) involves phosphorolytic excision of chain-terminating AZT-5'-monophosphate (AZTMP). Both pyrophosphate (PPi) and ATP act as excision substrates in vitro, but the intracellular substrate used during replication of AZT-resistant HIV is still unknown. PPi-mediated excision produces AZT-5'-triphosphate (AZTTP), which could be immediately re-used as a substrate for viral DNA chain termination. In contrast, ATP-mediated excision produces the novel compound AZT-(5')-tetraphospho-(5')-adenosine (AZTp4A). Since little is known of the interaction of AZTp4A with HIV-1 RT, we carried out kinetic and molecular modeling studies to probe this. AZTp4A was found to be a potent inhibitor of HIV-1 RT-catalyzed DNA synthesis and of both ATP- and PPi-mediated AZTMP excision. AZTp4A is in fact an excellent chain-terminating substrate for AZT-resistant RT-catalyzed DNA synthesis, better than AZTTP (k(pol)/K-d = 6.2 and 11.9 for AZTTP and AZTp4A, respectively). The affinity of AZT-resistant HIV-1 RT for AZTp4A is at least 30000-fold greater than that for the excision substrate ATP and similar to 10-fold greater than that for AZTTP. Dissociation of newly formed AZTp4A from RT may therefore provide a significant rate-limiting step for continued HIV-1 DNA synthesis. Our studies show that the products of PPi- and ATP-mediated excision of chain-terminating AZTMP (AZTTP and AZTp4A, respectively) are both potent chain-terminating substrates for HIV-1 RT, suggesting that there is no obvious benefit to HIV using ATP instead of PPi as the excision substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据