4.6 Article

Water-induced reconstruction that affects mobile ions on the surface of calcite

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 111, 期 3, 页码 505-514

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp0647129

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time-sequenced contact-force micrographs show that the (10 $$(1) over bar4) calcite cleavage surface reconstructs in humid air through pit formation and film growth. After 8 h at 80% relative humidity (RH), 50% to 80% of the surface is covered by islands that are flat-topped and 1-nm high. The lateral growth rates of individual islands are 4.2 +/- 0.4 nm min(-1) in the $$(4) over bar 41 direction and 1.8 +/- 0.4 nm min(-1) in the 84 $$(1) over bar direction, resulting in islands having distinct major and minor axes. On some samples, a contiguous, 1.5-nm-high film rapidly grows between the islands and the pits. The areal expansion rate of the film is 500 times faster than that of the islands. Gaps between the contiguous film and the islands expand and contract, which suggests that mass is exchanged between them and that both are loosely bound. Complementing the topographic images, polarization heights are simultaneously measured by polarization-force microscopy. The polarization heights of the islands and the contiguous film are -6 to -10 nm and -4 to -5 nm, respectively, compared to their respective topographic heights of +1.0 and +1.5 nm. Under our experimental conditions, the polarization heights are a surrogate for the local dielectric constant of the sample epsilon and arise from a convolution of the mobility and the density of surface ions. The polarization heights imply that epsilon(substrate) > epsilon(film) > epsilon(island). Changes in topographic and polarization heights at 20% and 50% RH suggest that the structures of the islands are in dynamic equilibrium with the adsorbed water. Our evidence suggests that the islands contain loosely bound water and may therefore be a hydrated calcium carbonate phase stabilized by the calcite surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据