4.5 Review

Tight junction protein expression and barrier properties of immortalized mouse brain microvessel endothelial cells

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1130, 期 1, 页码 17-30

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.083

关键词

blood-brain barrier; bEnd3 cells; ZO-1; claudin-5; confocal microscopy; monolayer permeability

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK070950, R01 DK059550-04, R01 DK059550, DK70950, R01 DK070950-02, DK59550] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [F32 NS043052, NS43052, F32 NS043052-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the molecular and biochemical mechanisms regulating the blood-brain barrier is aided by in vitro model systems. Many studies have used primary cultures of brain microvessel endothelial cells for this purpose. However, primary cultures limit the generation of material for molecular and biochemical assays since cells grow slowly, are prone to contamination by other neurovascular unit cells, and lose blood-brain barrier characteristics when passaged. To address these issues, immortalized cell lines have been generated. In these studies, we assessed the suitability of the immortalized mouse brain endothelial cell line, bEnd3, as a blood-brain barrier model. RT-PCR and immunofluorescence indicated expression of multiple tight junction proteins. bEnd3 cells formed barriers to radiolabeled sucrose, and responded like primary cultures to disrupting stimuli. Exposing cells to serum-free media on their basolateral side significantly decreased paracellular permeability; astrocyte-conditioned media did not enhance barrier properties. The serum-free media-induced decrease in permeability was correlated with an increase in claudin-5 and zonula occludens-1 immunofluorescence at cell-cell contracts. We conclude that bEnd3 cells are an attractive candidate as a model of the blood-brain barrier due to their rapid growth, maintenance of blood-brain barrier characteristics over repeated passages, formation of functional barriers and amenability to numerous molecular interventions. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据