4.6 Article

Lowering the concentration limits of detection by on-line solid-phase extraction-capillary electrophoresis-electrospray mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1140, 期 1-2, 页码 205-212

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.11.092

关键词

peptides; capillary electrophoresis; on-line preconcentration; solid-phase extraction; mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of solid-phase extraction coupled on-line to capillary electrophoresis using electrospray mass spectrometry detection (SPE-CE-ESI-MS) is described for the analysis of peptides in dilute solutions. A SPE microcartridge or analyte concentrator containing C Is derivatized silica particles as the extraction sorbent was easily constructed near the inlet of the separation capillary using commercially available materials. The reversed-phase sorbent selectively retained the target peptides, enabling large volumes of the sample to be introduced (> 100 mu L). The captured analytes were eluted in a small volume of an appropriate solution (20-50 nL). This resulted in sample clean-up and concentration enhancement, with minimum sample handling. As the SPE-CE conditions were compatible with on-line ESI-MS detection, the potential for identifying and characterizing the preconcentrated analytes by SPE-CE-ESI-MS using a sheath-flow CE-ESI-MS interface is also shown. Using separation electrolytes containing N-[carbamoylmethyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (ACES) at pH 7.4, an elution plug of 80:20 (v/v) (25 mM of formic acid in MeCN):H2O and a sheath liquid of 20 mM of acetic acid in 50:50 (v/v) methanol:H2O the concentration limits of detection for the analyzed peptides in the positive ion mode were lowered to narogram per milliliter levels. The systematic optimization of the operational parameters involved in the development of the SPE-CE method is described in detail, in order to promote robust and quantitative SPE-CE-ESI-MS analysis and facilitate the widespread use of the technique. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据