4.7 Article

Isotopic variation of precipitation over eastern Mongolia and its implication for the atmospheric water cycle

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 333, 期 1, 页码 21-34

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.022

关键词

atmospheric water cycle; stable isotope; Rayleigh model; continental recycling; Mongolia; RAISE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the atmospheric water cycle over eastern Mongolia and its surrounding regions, a monitoring network for stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in precipitation has been established. We obtained 66 monthly samples at six stations for a year from October 2002 to September 2003 and 204 daily samples at seven stations during the warm period from April to September of 2003. The observed isotopic composition showed considerable coherence in space and was characterized by a strong correlation with air temperatures (and a weak correlation with precipitation). A Rayteigh-type model involving the temperature and amount of precipitation successfully reproduced day-to-day variations in the observations with root mean square errors of 30%. for JD and 2.7%, for 6180. This good reproducibility demonstrates that isotopic variation of precipitation can be explained by rainout history during transportation from a single vapor-source reservoir. The conditions of the reservoirs generally corresponded with those for a subtropical marine atmosphere, indicating that continental recycling generally has a minor effect at least on the temporal variability of isotopes in the precipitation. In July, however, observed 6 values were very much lower than predicted. Considering the atmospheric circulation pattern and its relationship to isotopic data, it is inferred that the additive water vapor with tow 6 might be supplied from regions in the south (e.g., rice paddy fields in southeast China). Transient eddies can play an important role in transporting such water vapor to eastern Mongolia. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据