4.6 Article

Hyperoxia retards growth and induces apoptosis and loss of glands and blood vessels in DMBA-induced rat mammary tumors

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-23

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This study investigated the effects of hyperoxic treatment on growth, angiogenesis, apoptosis, general morphology and gene expression in DMBA-induced rat mammary tumors. Methods: One group of animals was exposed to normobaric hyperoxia (1 bar, pO(2) = 1.0 bar) and another group was exposed to hyperbaric hyperoxia (1.5 bar, pO(2) = 1.5 bar). A third group was treated with the commonly used chemotherapeutic drug 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), whereas animals housed under normal atmosphere (1 bar, pO(2) = 0.2 bar) served as controls. All treatments were performed on day 1, 4, 7 and 10 for 90 min. Tumor growth was calculated from caliper measurements. Biological effects of the treatment, was determined by assessment of vascular morphology (immunostaining for von Willebrandt factor) and apoptosis (TUNEL staining). Detailed gene expression profiles were obtained and verified by quantitative rtPCR. Results: Tumor growth was significantly reduced (similar to 57-66%) after hyperoxic treatment compared to control and even more than 5-FU (similar to 36%). Light microscopic observations of the tumor tissue showed large empty spaces within the tissue after hyperoxic treatment, probably due to loss of glands as indicated by a strong down-regulation of glandular secretory proteins. A significant reduction in mean vascular density (30-50%) was found after hyperoxic treatment. Furthermore, increased apoptosis (18-21%) was found after hyperoxic treatment. Conclusion: Thus, by increasing the pO(2) in mammary tumor tissue using normobaric and moderate hyperbaric oxygen therapy, a significant retardation in tumor growth is achieved, by loss of glands, reduction in vascular density and enhanced cell death. Hyperbaric oxygen should therefore be further evaluated as a tumor treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据