4.5 Article

The ecological basis of unusual sex roles in reverse-dichromatic eclectus parrots

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 97-103

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.013

关键词

eclectus parrot; Eclectus roratus; intrasexual competition; mate choice; reverse sexual dichromatism; sex roles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In theory, sex roles are determined by the potential reproductive rates of males and females, which are constrained by parental investment. Thus the sex that invests least in offspring typically competes most for matings and is most subject to sexual selection, whereas the caring sex is most choosy when selecting mates. Here I show that ecological variables, rather than patterns of parental investment, can be influential in determining sex roles and the direction of sexual selection. In the polyandrous eclectus parrot, Eclectus roratus, both sexes care for offspring, yet despite traditional parental care patterns, both sexes are competitive and both are subject to sexual selection. The bright red and blue females compete for scarce nest hollows and the iridescent green males for mates. Using data from an 8-year field study, I show that the major ecological variable driving this system is nest hollow quality. Females with drier hollows had higher reproductive success and more males feeding and competing to mate with them. Females with nest hollows that were prone to flooding had fewer fledglings in years with higher dry season rainfall, confirming that hollow quality was a primary determinant of reproductive success. Comparisons of females before and after they changed hollows during the study provided further evidence that these trends were due to hollow quality rather than individual female quality. Thus competition for a scarce resource can lead to high variance in female reproductive success, and promote competition for high-quality mates among males. (C) 2008 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据