4.5 Article

Minor workers have a major role in the maintenance of leafcutter ant pheromone trails

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 963-969

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.013

关键词

ant foraging; Atta; division of labour; leafcutter; pheromone trail; specialist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ants, especially those species that use pheromone trails for communication and orientation, are dominant in many ecosystems. Trail- using ants form large networks of foraging trails, which require regular updating because of pheromone decay and physical interruptions to continuity. We tested the hypothesis that leaf-cutter ants, Atta spp., possess trail maintenance workers to maintain trail network connectivity. The smallest workers in leafcutter ant colonies ( minims) are always present on trails but never engage in leaf transport. Using smoked glass we visualized trails and found that minims deposited pheromone trail with a much higher frequency ( 83.3%) than nonminims ( 20%). In the field, minims were observed to perform frequent U- turns on trails. Over the course of 10 min minims made a mean frequency of 18.0 U- turns while walking on the trail, whereas nonminims not engaged in leaf transport made a mean of only 2.02 U- turns. Ants carrying leaves never made U- turns. We investigated the effect of interruptions on trail traffic composition and the subsequent process of trail re- establishment. We simulated trail interruptions with two techniques: scraping away a section of trail and covering trail with soil. We found that the frequency of minims in the interrupted regions of trails increased by 21.0% following both types of interruption treatment. In contrast the frequency of nonminim workers in the interrupted regions declined by 44.8%. In the interrupted regions the proportion of workers represented by minims increased by 118%. Our results show a key role for Atta minims in the maintenance of pheromone trails.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据