4.5 Article

Female-female attraction influences nest establishment in the digger wasp Stizus continuus (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae)

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 1651-1661

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.018

关键词

conspecific attraction; digger wasp; Hymenoptera; nearest neighbour analysis; nest establishment; Stizus continuus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although digger wasps are good models for the study of nest site selection, the behaviour of females in relation to time of nest establishment has rarely been considered despite this being the key to discrimination between substrate availability-based and a female attraction-based selection. We carried out a study on nest establishment by the digger wasp Stizus continuus (Klug), giving to all nests dug by the wasps both spatial (nearest neighbour distance to nests, proximity of vegetation, soil hardness) and temporal (day of excavation) attributes. Stizus continuus females dug more nests under bush edges, where the soil was much softer. There was no tendency for females to maximize distance between nests at the moment of establishment. On the contrary, as shown by different nearest neighbour statistics, females preferentially tend to dig close to conspecific nests (if one considers both the whole study area and two subareas free of vegetation and at different times of the nesting season). Moreover, those nests that were active (still provisioned) attracted more females than the inactive nests at the moment of nest establishment. We conclude that female S. continuus are attracted by conspecifics at the moment of nest establishment and that clumped patterns of nests are a result of such social attraction rather than a result of limited available substrate; moreover, such attraction could be better detected when comparative analyses are employed and best at a multiple-scale view. (c) 2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据