4.5 Article

Subordinate wasps are more aggressive in colonies with low reproductive skew

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 879-886

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.009

关键词

microsatellites; Parischnogaster mellyi; primitively eusocial; reproductive transactions; social behaviour; Stenogastrinae; tug of war; wasps

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small societies of primitively eusocial wasps have provided interesting testing grounds for reproductive skew theory because all individuals have similar reproductive potential, which is unusual in social insects but common in vertebrate societies. Aggression is a key parameter in testing the theory, but empirical studies have seldom quantified aggression together with the entire array of other relevant variables. The few studies that have done so were recently criticized for failing to control for the overall level of social activity. We analysed behaviour and reproductive partitioning patterns in the stenogastrine wasp Parischnogaster mellyi. We used aggression of the subordinate (beta) breeder as key variable and analysed how relatedness, body size, number of breeders and productivity affect the interaction between the reproductive skew and the aggression while controlling for nest activity and actual interaction time between alpha and beta. We showed that (1) more even reproductive partitioning (lower reproductive skew) is associated with higher levels of aggression initiated by the beta subordinate independent of colony activity and (2) none of the currently available reproductive skew models is convincingly supported. Comparison of our results with earlier studies suggests that a common aggression-based mechanism for reproductive partitioning may apply across all primitively eusocial wasps despite complications arising from variable activity levels; however, currently available models may not apply. (c) 2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据