4.5 Article

The effects of group size, rate of turnover and disruption to demonstration on the stability of foraging traditions in fish

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 565-572

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.014

关键词

culture; fish; foraging; guppy; Poecilia reticulate; social learning; southern platyfish; tradition; Xiphophorus maculatus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is considerable laboratory-based evidence that social learning plays a role in the behaviour of many animals, including fish. However, a weakness of such studies in fish, is that in virtually all to date, the behaviour showed could be learned asocially, with the social influence merely accelerating the rate of learning. Lefebvre & Palameta (1988. Social Learning. Psychological and Biological Perspectives. pp. 141-164) argued that the most compelling evidence for social learning comes from studies where inexperienced animals are unlikely to learn the target behaviour by themselves. The present study is designed to address this concern, by employing a feeding tube task in which fish gain access to food by swimming in a manner that they would not normally show. Employing a transmission chain design, we show foraging traditions in guppies, Poecilia reticulata, and southern platyfish, Xiphophorus maculatus, in which shoal members continue to exploit the food available in the feeding tube, in spite of changes in the composition of the shoal due to the gradual removal of demonstrators. Two experiments provide strong evidence for social learning underlying traditional behaviour, such as migratory routes, in fish, and reveal how the stability of such traditions (duration within a population) is affected by group size (2, 4 or 6 fish) and rate of turnover (16.5%, 25% or 50% per day). While larger shoals of fish showed more stable traditions than smaller shoals, this was found to be related to their slower rate of turnover rather than a direct effect of group size. (C) 2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据