4.8 Article

Formulation of functionalized PLGA-PEG nanoparticles for in vivo targeted drug delivery

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 869-876

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.047

关键词

drug delivery; nanoparticle; PLGA; prostate cancer; targeting; aptamer

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 119349, U54 CA119349-02, U54 CA119349, U54 CA119349-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [K08 EB003647-01A1, K08 EB003647, K08 EB003647-02, EB 003647] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticle (NP) size has been shown to significantly affect the biodistribution of targeted and non-targeted NPs in an organ specific manner. Herein we have developed NPs from carboxy-terminated poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (PLGA-b-PEG-COOH) polymer and studied the effects of altering the following formulation parameters on the size of NPs: (1) polymer concentration, (2) drug loading, (3) water miscibility of solvent, and (4) the ratio of water to solvent. We found that NP mean volumetric size correlates linearly with polymer concentration for NPs between 70 and 250 nm in diameter (linear coefficient = 0.99 for NPs formulated with solvents studied). NPs with desirable size, drug loading, and polydispersity were conjugated to the A10 RNA aptamer (Apt) that binds to the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and NP and NP-Apt biodistribution was evaluated in a LNCaP (PSMA+) xenograft mouse model of prostate cancer. The surface functionalization of NPs with the A10 PSMA Apt significantly enhanced delivery of NPs to tumors vs. equivalent NPs lacking the A10 PSMA Apt (a 3.77-fold increase at 24 h; NP-Apt 0.83% +/- 0.21% vs. NP 0.22% +/- 0.07% of injected dose per grain of tissue; mean +/- SD, n = 4, p = 0.002). The ability to control NP size together with targeted delivery may result in favorable biodistribution and development of clinically relevant targeted therapies. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据