4.5 Article

Sex difference in mouth coloration and begging calls of barn swallow nestlings

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 1375-1382

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.011

关键词

barn swallow; begging calls; begging display; Hirundo rustica; nestling mouth coloration; parent-offspring communication; sex allocation; sexual dimorphism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In diverse animal taxa, offspring produce signals that serve the function of soliciting parents to provision care. In birds, such 'begging' signals may consist of vocal and visual displays that influence parental decisions on allocation of critical food resources among the progeny. According to sex allocation theory, parents may gain fitness benefits from favouring offspring of either sex, depending on ecological conditions or parental quality. However, adaptive allocation of care can occur only if parents can identify the sex of their offspring, which, however, appear to be sexually monomorphic in most bird species. Begging displays may be a vehicle of such sex-specific signals. However, only very few studies have investigated sex differences in begging calls and none has analysed sex differences in a main component of begging displays of passerine birds, that is, mouth coloration. In the present study, we show that male nestling barn swallows, Hirundo rustica, have more brightly coloured mouths than their female broodmates early in the nestling period. Sex differences in mouth coloration disappear later in the nestling period when, however, differences in begging calls develop, confirming the results of a previous study. Thus, begging displays carry sex-specific components whose nature ( visual or acoustic) changes during offspring ontogeny and might mediate the differential access of male and female offspring to parental care observed in this species, particularly under adverse rearing conditions. (C) 2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据