4.4 Article

Biological relevance of colony morphology and phenotypic switching by Burkholderia pseudomallei

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 189, 期 3, 页码 807-817

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01258-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Melioidosis is a notoriously protracted illness and is difficult to cure. We hypothesize that the causative organism, Burkholderia pseudomallei, undergoes a process of adaptation involving altered expression of surface determinants which facilitates persistence in vivo and that this is reflected by changes in colony morphology. A colony morphotyping scheme and typing algorithm were developed using clinical B. pseudomallei isolates. Morphotypes were divided into seven types (denoted I to VII). Type I gave rise to other morphotypes (most commonly type 11 or 111) by a process of switching in response to environmental stress, including starvation, iron limitation, and growth at 42 degrees C. Switching was associated with complex shifts in phenotype, one of which (type I to type 11) was associated with a marked increase in production of factors putatively associated with in vivo concealment. Isogenic types 11 and 111, derived from type 1, were examined using several experimental models. Switching between isogenic morphotypes occurred in a mouse model, where type 11 appeared to become adapted for persistence in a low-virulence state. Isogenic type 11 demonstrated a significant increase in intracellular replication fitness compared with parental type I after uptake by epithelial cells in vitro. Isogenic type III demonstrated a higher replication fitness following uptake by macrophages in vitro, which was associated with a switch to type II. Mixed B. pseudomallei morphologies were common in individual clinical specimens and were significantly more frequent in samples of blood, pus, and respiratory secretions than in urine and surface swabs. These findings have major implications for therapeutics and vaccine development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据