4.5 Article

Murine mammary carcinoma 4T1 induces a leukemoid reaction with splenomegaly: Association with tumor-derived growth factors

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 12-24

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2006.06.007

关键词

leukemoid; mammary carcinoma; 4T1; splenomegaly; growth factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A leukemoid reaction with granulocytosis and splenomegaly has been observed in animals and humans with a variety of tumors. We have employed four color flow cytometry to characterize the leukemoid reaction induced by the transplantable mouse mammary carcinoma 4T1 in female BALB/c mice. Gr-1(+) myeloid cells with the morphology of granulocytes increased in peripheral blood from < 15% pre-transplant to nearly 80% of total CD45(+) leukocytes at four weeks post-transplant. Though the granulocyte: lymphocyte ratio increased markedly, the absolute numbers of CD19(+) B lymphocytes, CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes, and the CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood did not change significantly. Femurs from tumor-bearing mice showed myeloid hyperplasia of the fatty marrow. There was a notable increase in cells with a Gr-1(dim)/CD11b(bright) immature granulocyte phenotype, and these cells were also found in peripheral blood and spleen. Spleen weights had increased 8.5-fold by four weeks post-tumor transplant, mainly due to granulocytic hyperplasia. Cultured 4T1 tumor cells constitutively expressed mRNA for the myeloid colony-stimulating factors G-CSF and GM-CSF, and IFN-gamma-inducible M-CSF transcripts were also detected. Tumors excised from mice had transcripts for G-CSF and GM-CSF, but only G-CSF protein was found in high levels in serum of tumor-bearing mice. These data demonstrate that 4T1 tumor-bearing mice exhibit a leukemoid reaction that apparently is caused by the production of colony-stimulating factors produced by the tumor. The 4T1 tumor may serve as an excellent model for the study of this reaction. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据