4.4 Review

Neurophysiology of prehension. II. Response diversity in primary somatosensory (S-I) and motor (M-I) cortices

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 1656-1670

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01031.2006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS044820, R01 NS044820-04, R01 NS011862-26, R01 NS 44820, R01 NS 11862, R01 NS011862] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prehension responses of 76 neurons in primary somatosensory (S-I) and motor (M-I) cortices were analyzed in three macaques during performance of a grasp and lift task. Digital video recordings of hand kinematics synchronized to neuronal spike trains were compared with responses in posterior parietal areas 5 and AIP/7b (PPC) of the same monkeys during seven task stages: 1) approach, 2) contact, 3) grasp, 4) lift, 5) hold, 6) lower, and 7) relax. S-I and M-I firing patterns signaled particular hand actions, rather than overall task goals. S-I responses were more diverse than those in PPC, occurred later in time, and focused primarily on grasping. Sixty-three percent of S-I neurons fired at peak rates during contact and/or grasping. Lift, hold, and lowering excited fewer S- I cells. Only 8% of S-I cells fired at peak rates before contact, compared with 27% in PPC. M-I responses were also diverse, forming functional groups for hand preshaping, object acquisition, and grip force application. M-I activity began <= 500 ms before contact, coinciding with the earliest activity in PPC. Activation of specific muscle groups in the hand was paralleled by matching patterns of somatosensory feedback from S- I needed for efficient performance. These findings support hypotheses that predictive and planning components of prehension are represented in PPC and premotor cortex, whereas performance and feedback circuits dominate activity in M-I and S-I. Somatosensory feedback from the hand to S-I enables real- time adjustments of grasping by connections to M-I and updates future prehension plans through projections to PPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据